Here we have the final outcome of
InterCasino report: - the player broke the rules. OK, winnings voided fairly, but a couple of questions:
1. The player simply asked the casino to be told the exact rule he broke. Why for this to happen it took one month and the GG involving?
2. What is fair and what is not regarding bonus terms? I think if you are a casino manager and want to give a bonus, the only restrictions you are fairly allowed to impose is a wagering requirement + what games contribute to the wagering requirement and whether or not the bonus is cashable. Any other restrictions like maximum bet, maximum win, different game weighting or not allowed games towards the wagering requirement are predatory terms and should damage the reputation of your company. - For example if I give you a slots only bonus all slots, including progressive should count 100%, no maximum bet, no maximum possible win. So if you did hit a 1M jackpot is yours to keep. If your hear tell you to play a bit of blackjack meanwhile, very well, play any game you want but just be aware that will not count towards wagering requirement! - Many players hit jackpots while playing with max cashouts bonuses, do casinos pocket those money?
3. I'll now give you an example of a predatory Bonus Term for a 100% deposit bonus up to $100: - play ANY game you want, max allowed bet is 1% of your initial bonus amount, higher bets will lead confiscation of winnings & deposit (consider that table games min bet = $1)
Did you spot the catch already? - If you want to play any table game with this bonus you have to take the full bonus amount and always bet table minimum $1. This implies that you are NOT allowed to double or split in blackjack, rise if you play any table poker and always fold on ties playing casino war; the only table games for you to play are craps and baccarat making minimum allowed bets. If you play slots you should also bet no higher than $1 per spin and if you just deposited $20 you should make sure your slot bets are not higher than $0.2!
So where is the line, what is fair and what is not in relation to Casino Terms? - Until when we should accept that if it's in the Terms is fair?