Joined: 7/2/2011(UTC) Posts: 611 
|
Here is the Leo Jackpot grumble Report. I'd say the casino is very wrong on taking this action because at best, the terms were not clear enough to let the player understand that a deposit is different than a cash transfer between the company wallets. - What do you think? *If I have $1000 in my sportbook wallet ready to use on any Leo Jackpot product (including Casino), I'd see absolutely no reason to deposit another $20 into my account. Would be ridiculous! But OK, if that was the intention of Leo Jackpot, then it should specify in its T&C's that a cash transfer between company wallets does not substitute for a deposit! My suggestion is that Gambling City should try and renegotiate this outcome because, at best the terms were not clear enough. - Maybe say pay the player in half and update the T&C's?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.